F-35 Lightning II vs F/A-18E Super Hornet Comparison : Which fighter is better

The world of modern military aviation is marked by constant innovation and technological advancements. Two prominent contenders in this arena are the F-35 Lightning II and the F/A-18E Super Hornet, both representing the cutting edge of aerial combat capabilities. In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into various aspects of these two fighter aircraft, ranging from their design and development to performance, avionics, weaponry, and operational roles. By the end of this article, you will have a deeper understanding of how these aircraft measure up against each other in the realm of contemporary air warfare.

F-35 Lightning II vs F/A-18E Super Hornet Comparison Table

here’s a comparison table between the F-35 Lightning II and the F/A-18E Super Hornet:

Category F-35 Lightning II F/A-18E Super Hornet
Manufacturer Lockheed Martin Boeing
Role Multirole Fighter Multirole Fighter
First Flight 2006 1995
Introduction 2015 (Initial Operational Capability) 2001 (Block II)
Unit Cost (Approx.) $89.2 million (F-35A, as of 2021) $70-80 million (as of 2021)
Maximum Speed Mach 1.6 (1,200 mph or 1,930 km/h) Mach 1.8 (1,190 mph or 1,915 km/h)
Range 1,200 nautical miles (2,220 km) 1,275 nautical miles (2,346 km)
Service Ceiling 50,000 feet (15,000 m) 50,000 feet (15,000 m)
Engines 1 x Pratt & Whitney F135-PW-100 turbofan (F-35A and F-35C) 1 x Pratt & Whitney F135-PW-600 turbofan (F-35B, Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing) 2 x General Electric F414-GE-400 turbofans
Thrust (per engine) 43,000 lbf (F-35A) 40,000 lbf (F-35B) 43,000 lbf (F-35C) 22,000 lbf (dry thrust), 44,000 lbf (afterburner)
Crew 1 1 or 2
Length 51 feet 4 inches (15.67 meters) 60 feet 1.25 inches (18.31 meters)
Wingspan 35 feet 0 inches (10.7 meters) 44 feet 8.5 inches (13.62 meters)
Height 14 feet 8 inches (4.42 meters) 16 feet (4.88 meters)
Wing Area 460 sq ft (42.74 sq m) 500 sq ft (46.45 sq m)
Maximum Takeoff Weight 70,000 pounds (31,800 kg) class 66,000 pounds (29,937 kg)
Armament Internal and external hardpoints for missiles, bombs, and other munitions (F-35A: 4 internal, F-35B/C: 2 internal) Air-to-air and air-to-ground ordnance (AIM-120, AIM-9X, GBU-12, GBU-31, etc.) 11 weapon stations for a variety of air-to-air and air-to-ground ordnance (AIM-9 Sidewinder, AIM-120 AMRAAM, AGM-88 HARM, JDAM, etc.)
Operational Roles Air superiority, ground attack, electronic warfare, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, etc. Air superiority, ground attack, maritime strike, aerial refueling, electronic warfare, etc.
Carrier-Based Variant (If Applicable) F-35C (Carrier Variant) F/A-18E (Super Hornet) is designed for carrier operations
Notable Operators U.S. and multiple international partners U.S. Navy, U.S. Marine Corps, various international operators
Stealth Capabilities Highly stealthy, designed to operate in contested environments Moderate stealth capabilities
Notable Features Advanced sensors, sensor fusion, stealth, vertical landing capability (F-35B), carrier-based operations (F-35C) Carrier compatibility, versatility, proven combat history
Development Status In service and continuing development In service and continuing development

Please note that the specific capabilities and configurations of these aircraft may vary between different versions and variants.

Size Comparison between F-35 Lightning II vs F/A-18E Super Hornet

here’s the size comparison between the F-35 Lightning II and the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet:

Category F-35 Lightning II F/A-18E/F Super Hornet
Length 15.6 meters (50.0 feet) 18.4 meters (60 feet 1 inch)
Wingspan 10.7 meters (35 feet 0 inches) 13.65 meters (45 feet 0 inches)
Wing Area 42.0 square meters (460 square feet) 46.5 square meters (500 square feet)
Height 4.33 meters (14.2 feet) 4.88 meters (16 feet 0 inches)
Weight 13,200 kilograms (30,200 pounds) 14,500 kilograms (32,000 pounds)
Power 1 x 190 kN (43,000 lbf) 2 x 97 kN (22,000 lbf) each

These specifications provide a comparison of the size and dimensions of the F-35 Lightning II and the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet.

here’s the comparison of dogfight (close to medium range) ratings between the F-35 Lightning II and the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet:

Category F-35 Lightning II F/A-18E/F Super Hornet
Cannon GAU-22/A M61A1 Vulcan
Caliber (mm) 20 mm 20 mm
Rate of Fire (rpm) 4,200 rpm 6,000 rpm
Muzzle Velocity 1,000 m/s 1,050 m/s
Size Point 10%-30% 20% 20%
Maneuverability 8.5 7.8
Thrust/Weight Ratio 1.07 1.03
AAM (first) AIM-9X AIM-7 Sparrow
Operational Range 0.2 – 50 km 0.2 – 50 km
AAM (second) IRIS-T AIM-7 Sidewinder
Operational Range 0.5 – 30 km 0.5 – 30 km
Dogfight Rating 70% 57%

These ratings provide a comparison of dogfight capabilities between the F-35 Lightning II and the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, including cannon specifications, maneuverability, and air-to-air missile capabilities in close to medium-range combat scenarios.

Design and Development

F-35 Lightning II:

  • Manufacturer: Lockheed Martin
  • Role: Multirole Fighter
  • First Flight: 2006
  • Introduction: 2015
  • Unit Cost: US$89.2 million (F-35A, as of 2021)

F/A-18E Super Hornet:

  • Manufacturer: Boeing
  • Role: Multirole Fighter
  • First Flight: 1995
  • Introduction: 2001
  • Unit Cost: Approximately US$66 million (as of 2021)

The F-35 Lightning II, designed by Lockheed Martin, is a fifth-generation stealth fighter developed for the United States and its allies. In contrast, the F/A-18E Super Hornet, developed by Boeing, is a fourth-generation multirole fighter known for its adaptability and versatility.

F-35 Lightning II vs F/A-18E Super Hornet Detail Comparison

Performance

F-35 Lightning II:

  • Maximum Speed: Mach 1.6 (1,200 mph or 1,930 km/h)
  • Range: 1,200 nautical miles (2,220 km)
  • Service Ceiling: 50,000 feet (15,000 meters)
  • Engines: 1 x Pratt & Whitney F135-PW-100 turbofan (F-35A)

F/A-18E Super Hornet:

  • Maximum Speed: Mach 1.8 (1,190 mph or 1,915 km/h)
  • Range: Approximately 1,275 nautical miles (2,346 km)
  • Service Ceiling: 50,000 feet (15,000 meters)
  • Engines: 2 x General Electric F414-GE-400 turbofans

The F-35 Lightning II offers impressive stealth capabilities and advanced avionics, making it highly effective in both air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. On the other hand, the F/A-18E Super Hornet boasts excellent speed and range, making it a reliable workhorse for various mission profiles.

Avionics and Sensors

F-35 Lightning II:

  • Radar: AN/APG-81 AESA radar
  • Sensors: Distributed Aperture System (DAS), Electro-Optical Targeting System (EOTS), AN/ASQ-239 Barracuda electronic warfare suite

F/A-18E Super Hornet:

  • Radar: AN/APG-79 AESA radar
  • Sensors: AN/ASQ-228 ATFLIR targeting pod, AN/ALR-67(V)3 electronic warfare countermeasures system

The F-35’s advanced sensor fusion and stealth technology give it a significant edge in situational awareness and survivability. The F/A-18E Super Hornet, while equipped with capable systems, may not match the F-35’s sensor sophistication.

Weaponry and Payload

F-35 Lightning II:

  • Internal Weapons Bay: AIM-120 AMRAAM, AIM-9X Sidewinder, and precision-guided munitions (PGMs)
  • External Hardpoints: Additional air-to-air and air-to-ground ordnance

F/A-18E Super Hornet:

  • Internal Weapons: AIM-9X Sidewinder and AIM-120 AMRAAM
  • External Hardpoints: A wide variety of air-to-air and air-to-ground munitions

The F-35’s internal weapons bay preserves its stealth profile while carrying a range of munitions, while the F/A-18E Super Hornet features external hardpoints for flexible mission configurations.

Operational Roles

F-35 Lightning II:

  • Roles: Air superiority, ground attack, electronic warfare, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance (ISR)
  • Operators: Several nations worldwide

F/A-18E Super Hornet:

  • Roles: Air superiority, ground attack, aerial refueling, electronic warfare
  • Operators: United States Navy, several international customers

The F-35 Lightning II is known for its multirole capabilities, making it suitable for various mission types, while the F/A-18E Super Hornet excels in roles like air superiority and strike missions.

Similarity between F-35 Lightning II and the F/A-18E Super Hornet

The F-35 Lightning II and the F/A-18E Super Hornet, while distinct aircraft with their own unique features, share several similarities:

  1. Multirole Capabilities: Both aircraft are designed to be versatile and excel in multiple mission roles, making them suitable for various combat scenarios. They can perform air-to-air combat, ground attack, electronic warfare, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) missions.
  2. Advanced Avionics: Both the F-35 and F/A-18E are equipped with advanced avionics and sensor systems. They feature modern radar systems, electronic warfare suites, and targeting pods to enhance situational awareness and combat effectiveness.
  3. Carrier-Based Operations: Both aircraft have variants specifically designed for carrier-based operations. The F/A-18E Super Hornet is a carrier-based fighter used by the United States Navy, while the F-35 Lightning II has carrier variants (F-35B and F-35C) that can operate from aircraft carriers.
  4. Air-to-Air and Air-to-Ground Munitions: Both aircraft have the capability to carry a wide range of air-to-air and air-to-ground munitions, including guided missiles, bombs, and precision-guided munitions. This versatility allows them to engage various types of targets effectively.
  5. Supersonic Speed: Both the F-35 and F/A-18E are capable of flying at supersonic speeds, although the exact top speeds and performance characteristics may differ.
  6. Modern Cockpit: Both aircraft feature modern cockpit designs with advanced displays and controls to assist pilots in managing complex missions and handling large amounts of data.
  7. Operated by Multiple Nations: Both the F-35 Lightning II and the F/A-18E Super Hornet have international operators. While the F-35 is used by multiple countries worldwide, the F/A-18E Super Hornet has been exported to several nations.
  8. Role in Modern Air Forces: Both aircraft play vital roles in modern air forces, contributing to the overall combat capabilities of their respective nations. They are essential components of their countries’ airpower strategies.

Despite these similarities, it’s important to note that the two aircraft also have significant differences in terms of design, stealth capabilities, production timelines, and other characteristics, which make them suitable for different mission profiles and operational requirements.

Conclusion : F-35 Lightning II and the F/A-18E Super Hornet

In the ever-evolving landscape of military aviation, the F-35 Lightning II and the F/A-18E Super Hornet occupy distinct niches. The F-35’s fifth-generation technology and stealth features give it an edge in terms of survivability and situational awareness, making it a global powerhouse in multirole missions. On the other hand, the F/A-18E Super Hornet, a fourth-generation workhorse, shines with its adaptability, reliability, and cost-effectiveness.

Ultimately, the choice between these aircraft depends on the specific requirements, budget, and strategic objectives of the nations employing them. Both aircraft contribute to the diverse capabilities of modern air forces and continue to shape the future of aerial warfare.

Faqs About F-35 Lightning II and the F/A-18E Super Hornet

Q1: Which country operates the F-35 Lightning II and the F/A-18E Super Hornet?

The F-35 Lightning II is operated by several countries worldwide, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Japan, and many others. On the other hand, the F/A-18E Super Hornet is primarily operated by the United States Navy, with some international customers, such as Australia and Kuwait.

Q2: What are the primary roles of these aircraft?

The F-35 Lightning II serves as a multirole fighter, capable of air superiority, ground attack, electronic warfare, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) missions. The F/A-18E Super Hornet is primarily used for air superiority, ground attack, aerial refueling, and electronic warfare.

Q3: How do the unit costs of these aircraft compare?

As of 2021, the unit cost of the F-35A Lightning II is approximately US$89.2 million, while the F/A-18E Super Hornet costs approximately US$66 million. These costs can vary based on specific variants and contract negotiations.

Q4: Which aircraft offers better stealth capabilities?

The F-35 Lightning II is renowned for its advanced stealth capabilities, allowing it to operate undetected by enemy radar systems. The F/A-18E Super Hornet does not have the same level of stealth features.

Q5: What are the key differences in terms of avionics and sensors between these aircraft?

The F-35 Lightning II features advanced avionics, including the AN/APG-81 AESA radar, Distributed Aperture System (DAS), Electro-Optical Targeting System (EOTS), and AN/ASQ-239 Barracuda electronic warfare suite. The F/A-18E Super Hornet is equipped with the AN/APG-79 AESA radar, AN/ASQ-228 ATFLIR targeting pod, and AN/ALR-67(V)3 electronic warfare countermeasures system.

Q6: Which aircraft has a longer operational range?

The F-35 Lightning II has a range of approximately 1,200 nautical miles (2,220 km), while the F/A-18E Super Hornet has an operational range of approximately 1,275 nautical miles (2,346 km). The Super Hornet has a slight edge in this regard.

Q7: Can these aircraft carry a wide variety of munitions?

Yes, both aircraft have the capability to carry various air-to-air and air-to-ground munitions. The F-35 Lightning II has internal weapons bays to maintain its stealth profile while carrying a range of precision-guided munitions.

Q8: How do these aircraft compare in terms of dogfighting capabilities?

The F/A-18E Super Hornet holds an advantage in dogfighting capabilities, with a higher dogfight rating of 89%, compared to the F-35 Lightning II’s rating of 70%. The Super Hornet’s agility and maneuverability contribute to this advantage.

Q9: Are these aircraft suitable for carrier-based operations?

Yes, both the F/A-18E Super Hornet and the F-35 Lightning II are suitable for carrier-based operations. The Super Hornet is a carrier-based aircraft used by the U.S. Navy, while the F-35 Lightning II has carrier variants (F-35B and F-35C) designed for naval operations.

Q10: How do these aircraft contribute to modern air forces?

These aircraft play critical roles in modern air forces by providing a range of capabilities. The F-35 Lightning II excels in stealth, sensor fusion, and multirole missions, while the F/A-18E Super Hornet offers adaptability, reliability, and cost-effectiveness in various mission profiles. Their contributions are tailored to the specific needs of the nations employing them, shaping the future of aerial warfare.

Leave a Comment